H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Joao Sousa H2H: 2-0
Laslo Djere holds a 2–0 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laslo Djere leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2023 Santiago third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2023* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-3 6-2 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2022* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Laslo Djere | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Joao Sousa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |