H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Marius Copil H2H: 1-0
Laslo Djere holds a 1–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laslo Djere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2018 Pune third round 5-7 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2018* | Pune | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Laslo Djere | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | Marius Copil | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2017 | Marrakech | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-1 0-0 (ret.) | Marius Copil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |