H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Laurence Tieleman vs Byron Black H2H: 1-1
Laurence Tieleman and Byron Black are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laurence Tieleman leads 1–0 on grass, while Byron Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 2000 Shanghai fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2000* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Byron Black | (w/o) | Laurence Tieleman | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1998* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Laurence Tieleman | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,652 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Byron Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |