H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Laurence Tieleman vs Carlos Costa H2H: 0-2

Carlos Costa holds a 2–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Costa leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1999 Orlando round of 32 6-3 6-0.

ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Costa #125 6-3 6-0 Laurence Tieleman #79 Match data Apr 22, 1999* R32 Orlando ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Carlos Costa #61 6-0 6-4 Laurence Tieleman #308 Match data Oct 30, 1997* R32 Bogota World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,653 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carlos Costa #1,297 #10 1,663 1,961 237 202 54.0% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Tieleman Carlos Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0 1988 2–2 50.0% #243 1,524 0 0
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,533 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #201 1,512 0 0
22 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0 1990 6–8 42.9% #151 1,555 0 0
23 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0 1991 15–13 53.6% #55 1,659 0 0
24 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0 1992 39–21 65.0% #14 1,763 0 2
25 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,594 0 0 1993 42–23 64.6% #26 1,873 0 4
26 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,605 0 0 1994 35–26 57.4% #27 1,677 0 6
27 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,547 0 0 1995 29–22 56.9% #31 1,756 0 6
28 1996 25–25 50.0% #61 1,647 0 6
29 1997 20–23 46.5% #56 1,629 0 6
30 1998 21–24 46.7% #67 1,570 0 6
31 1999 1–10 9.1% #472 1,475 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Tieleman Carlos Costa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1988 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 5 4 9 55.6% 10 9 19 52.6%
24 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 4 5 9 44.4% 33 10 43 76.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1998 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 7 5 12 58.3% 32 13 45 71.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% 25 14 39 64.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
27 2000 8 10 18 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 25 18 43 58.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1996 6 9 15 40.0% 18 14 32 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1997 0 6 6 0.0% 20 16 36 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1998 7 8 15 46.7% 14 15 29 48.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
Career 19 31 50 38.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 20 18 38 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 41 51 92 44.6% 188 127 315 59.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 19 24 20.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 360/414 of Carlos Costa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laurence Tieleman Carlos Costa
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1993 8/8 7.0 5.1 50.6% 77.1% 53.4% 68.2% 45.1% 66.3% 33.8% —/—
22 1995 5/6 6.4 4.8 48.4% 67.5% 47.5% 63.8% 50.6% 57.1% 28.1% —/—
23 1996 3/5 3.3 7.3 47.5% 73.9% 51.1% 61.3% 39.9% 62.1% 34.0% 1991 22/28 4.3 2.6 51.4% 70.6% 48.5% 57.5% 50.6% 59.8% 44.3%
24 1997 2/2 8.0 8.5 54.8% 68.1% 38.6% 46.8% 28.6% 54.8% 33.6% 1992 52/60 4.4 2.3 53.3% 70.1% 52.9% 58.0% 44.4% 61.9% 43.0%
25 1998 17/17 6.9 6.1 51.7% 78.8% 49.4% 58.3% 39.8% 64.2% 33.9% 1993 59/65 5.1 2.2 55.2% 72.8% 53.9% 56.4% 47.1% 64.2% 43.6%
26 1999 32/35 6.6 4.3 54.6% 75.3% 50.7% 54.8% 37.8% 64.1% 33.4% 1994 51/61 3.9 2.8 55.9% 69.4% 51.0% 52.6% 46.0% 61.0% 42.9%
27 2000 20/29 9.6 5.6 49.3% 73.6% 46.7% 54.3% 35.2% 59.9% 31.9% 1995 47/51 4.1 2.6 57.3% 68.3% 48.0% 53.5% 43.7% 59.4% 41.2%
28 —/— 1996 40/50 3.2 2.7 55.2% 66.1% 45.5% 47.7% 48.4% 56.9% 43.6%
29 —/— 1997 37/43 2.6 2.2 58.5% 63.6% 46.6% 52.9% 49.2% 56.6% 40.3%
30 —/— 1998 42/45 4.4 3.2 55.4% 70.1% 45.9% 55.0% 48.1% 59.5% 41.4%
31 —/— 1999 10/11 5.4 2.3 55.6% 69.0% 45.1% 41.4% 48.6% 58.6% 38.6%
Career 87/103 7.3 5.3 51.9% 75.1% 49.3% 57.2% 38.9% 62.7% 32.9% 360/439 4.1 2.6 55.4% 69.1% 49.4% 53.9% 46.8% 60.2% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Tieleman Carlos Costa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1993 1539 101.3 +0.30 -0.77 1.004 48.9% +98 47.6% -0.52 1–1 1–1 +0.78 1988 1525 111.4 +31 50.0% -0.10 1–1 +0.09
21 1994 1533 100.6 40.0% -0.80 0–1 2–0 -0.18 1989 1512 107.2 +23 33.3% -1.56 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.12
22 1995 1526 97.9 -1.88 -3.07 0.656 44.0% +108 30.8% -1.69 1–0 1–0 +0.41 1990 1555 125.0 +67 45.5% -0.33 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 95.8 -0.64
23 1996 1484 97.3 -0.40 +0.45 0.896 48.4% +155 27.3% -0.91 0–1 0–2 +0.53 1991 1659 134.9 +0.10 +2.53 1.103 52.1% -95 +49 54.8% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.9 +0.42
24 1997 1459 103.0 -1.61 -3.02 0.744 44.8% 28.6% -1.43 0–1 +0.07 1992 1763 151.0 +1.18 +3.78 1.126 52.4% -156 +121 61.5% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 12–9 (57%) 102.6 -0.98
25 1998 1594 123.4 +1.29 -2.10 0.947 50.0% -107 +163 53.7% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 107.0 +0.20 1993 1873 154.5 +3.13 +3.68 1.220 53.7% -176 +95 64.1% +1.05 10–15 (40%) 12–15 (44%) 93.5 +1.77
26 1999 1605 122.2 +1.18 -3.84 0.930 48.7% -38 +94 45.3% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +1.02 1994 1677 142.1 +0.42 +3.28 1.101 51.8% 0 +125 56.8% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 15–10 (60%) 99.6 +1.72
27 2000 1548 109.7 -1.89 -4.30 0.796 46.5% +23 -109 +70 37.9% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 98.2 +1.41 1995 1757 144.5 -0.47 +1.82 1.016 50.4% -46 +58 54.5% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 12–9 (57%) 104.7 -0.98
28 2001 1533 99.5 1996 1647 138.9 -2.69 +4.11 1.012 50.4% +30 +93 49.2% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.1 -0.10
29 2002 1503 95.8 1997 1629 132.1 -3.34 +1.11 0.927 48.5% -56 +109 47.5% -0.29 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.5 +0.95
30 1998 1571 136.2 -1.98 +2.09 1.021 50.6% +15 +79 51.4% +0.16 5–11 (31%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.64
31 1999 1475 106.0 -1.58 -0.67 0.931 48.2% +34 +99 21.4% -1.32 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.13
Career 1653 115.4 +0.12 -3.11 0.882 48.1% -24 -109 +118 42.8% -0.61 12–17 (41%) 21–21 (50%) 102.1 +4.16 1961 147.0 -0.23 +2.80 1.066 51.3% -54 +91 54.2% +0.32 66–79 (46%) 74–66 (53%) 98.9 +0.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.