Laurence Tieleman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Carlos Costa holds a 2–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Costa leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1999 Orlando round of 32 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Costa | 6-3 6-0 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data | Apr 22, 1999* | R32 | Orlando | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Carlos Costa | 6-0 6-4 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data | Oct 30, 1997* | R32 | Bogota | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,653 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,961 | 237 | 202 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,873 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,475 | 0 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 33 | 10 | 43 | 76.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 25 | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 32 | 13 | 45 | 71.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1999 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1994 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% |
| 27 | 2000 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 25 | 18 | 43 | 58.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 20 | 18 | 38 | 52.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 41 | 51 | 92 | 44.6% | 188 | 127 | 315 | 59.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 19 | 24 | 20.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 360/414 of Carlos Costa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1993 | 8/8 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 50.6% | 77.1% | 53.4% | 68.2% | 45.1% | 66.3% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 5/6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 48.4% | 67.5% | 47.5% | 63.8% | 50.6% | 57.1% | 28.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 3/5 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 47.5% | 73.9% | 51.1% | 61.3% | 39.9% | 62.1% | 34.0% | 1991 | 22/28 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 51.4% | 70.6% | 48.5% | 57.5% | 50.6% | 59.8% | 44.3% |
| 24 | 1997 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 54.8% | 68.1% | 38.6% | 46.8% | 28.6% | 54.8% | 33.6% | 1992 | 52/60 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 53.3% | 70.1% | 52.9% | 58.0% | 44.4% | 61.9% | 43.0% |
| 25 | 1998 | 17/17 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 51.7% | 78.8% | 49.4% | 58.3% | 39.8% | 64.2% | 33.9% | 1993 | 59/65 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 55.2% | 72.8% | 53.9% | 56.4% | 47.1% | 64.2% | 43.6% |
| 26 | 1999 | 32/35 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 54.6% | 75.3% | 50.7% | 54.8% | 37.8% | 64.1% | 33.4% | 1994 | 51/61 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 55.9% | 69.4% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 46.0% | 61.0% | 42.9% |
| 27 | 2000 | 20/29 | 9.6 | 5.6 | 49.3% | 73.6% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 35.2% | 59.9% | 31.9% | 1995 | 47/51 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 57.3% | 68.3% | 48.0% | 53.5% | 43.7% | 59.4% | 41.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 40/50 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 55.2% | 66.1% | 45.5% | 47.7% | 48.4% | 56.9% | 43.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 37/43 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 58.5% | 63.6% | 46.6% | 52.9% | 49.2% | 56.6% | 40.3% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 42/45 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 55.4% | 70.1% | 45.9% | 55.0% | 48.1% | 59.5% | 41.4% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10/11 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 55.6% | 69.0% | 45.1% | 41.4% | 48.6% | 58.6% | 38.6% |
| Career | — | 87/103 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 51.9% | 75.1% | 49.3% | 57.2% | 38.9% | 62.7% | 32.9% | — | 360/439 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 55.4% | 69.1% | 49.4% | 53.9% | 46.8% | 60.2% | 42.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1539 | 101.3 | +0.30 | -0.77 | 1.004 | 48.9% | — | — | +98 | 47.6% | -0.52 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.78 | 1988 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.09 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1533 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.18 | 1989 | 1512 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 33.3% | -1.56 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.12 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1526 | 97.9 | -1.88 | -3.07 | 0.656 | 44.0% | — | — | +108 | 30.8% | -1.69 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 1990 | 1555 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | 45.5% | -0.33 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.8 | -0.64 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1484 | 97.3 | -0.40 | +0.45 | 0.896 | 48.4% | — | — | +155 | 27.3% | -0.91 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.53 | 1991 | 1659 | 134.9 | +0.10 | +2.53 | 1.103 | 52.1% | -95 | +49 | — | 54.8% | +0.42 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.9 | +0.42 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1459 | 103.0 | -1.61 | -3.02 | 0.744 | 44.8% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | 1992 | 1763 | 151.0 | +1.18 | +3.78 | 1.126 | 52.4% | -156 | +121 | — | 61.5% | +0.86 | 6–5 (55%) | 12–9 (57%) | 102.6 | -0.98 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1594 | 123.4 | +1.29 | -2.10 | 0.947 | 50.0% | -107 | — | +163 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–2 (71%) | 107.0 | +0.20 | 1993 | 1873 | 154.5 | +3.13 | +3.68 | 1.220 | 53.7% | -176 | +95 | — | 64.1% | +1.05 | 10–15 (40%) | 12–15 (44%) | 93.5 | +1.77 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1605 | 122.2 | +1.18 | -3.84 | 0.930 | 48.7% | -38 | — | +94 | 45.3% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–8 (47%) | 99.6 | +1.02 | 1994 | 1677 | 142.1 | +0.42 | +3.28 | 1.101 | 51.8% | 0 | +125 | — | 56.8% | +0.48 | 9–10 (47%) | 15–10 (60%) | 99.6 | +1.72 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1548 | 109.7 | -1.89 | -4.30 | 0.796 | 46.5% | +23 | -109 | +70 | 37.9% | -0.71 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.2 | +1.41 | 1995 | 1757 | 144.5 | -0.47 | +1.82 | 1.016 | 50.4% | -46 | +58 | — | 54.5% | +0.22 | 11–7 (61%) | 12–9 (57%) | 104.7 | -0.98 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1533 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1647 | 138.9 | -2.69 | +4.11 | 1.012 | 50.4% | +30 | +93 | — | 49.2% | +0.02 | 9–6 (60%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.1 | -0.10 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1503 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1629 | 132.1 | -3.34 | +1.11 | 0.927 | 48.5% | -56 | +109 | — | 47.5% | -0.29 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.5 | +0.95 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1571 | 136.2 | -1.98 | +2.09 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +15 | +79 | — | 51.4% | +0.16 | 5–11 (31%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.3 | +0.64 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1475 | 106.0 | -1.58 | -0.67 | 0.931 | 48.2% | +34 | +99 | — | 21.4% | -1.32 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | — | 1653 | 115.4 | +0.12 | -3.11 | 0.882 | 48.1% | -24 | -109 | +118 | 42.8% | -0.61 | 12–17 (41%) | 21–21 (50%) | 102.1 | +4.16 | — | 1961 | 147.0 | -0.23 | +2.80 | 1.066 | 51.3% | -54 | +91 | — | 54.2% | +0.32 | 66–79 (46%) | 74–66 (53%) | 98.9 | +0.66 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Berasategui | 3 | 7 | 10 | Oct 3, 1997 | H2H |
| Magnus Gustafsson | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 9, 1997 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jul 23, 1998 | H2H |
| Javier Sanchez | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jan 16, 1998 | H2H |