H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Laurence Tieleman vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 0-1
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1997 US Open first round 4-6 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 4-6 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,652 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |