H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Laurence Tieleman vs David Wheaton H2H: 0-1

David Wheaton holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1995 Newport quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laurence Tieleman
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Wheaton #28 6-3 6-2 Laurence Tieleman #159 Match data Jul 15, 1995* QF Newport ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,653 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Tieleman David Wheaton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0
20 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,533 0 0 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1
22 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2
23 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2
24 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2
25 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,594 0 0 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3
26 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,605 0 0 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3
27 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,547 0 0 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Tieleman David Wheaton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
22 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 2000 8 10 18 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 20 18 38 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 269/322 of David Wheaton's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laurence Tieleman David Wheaton
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1993 8/8 7.0 5.1 50.6% 77.1% 53.4% 68.2% 45.1% 66.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 5/6 6.4 4.8 48.4% 67.5% 47.5% 63.8% 50.6% 57.1% 28.1% 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3%
23 1996 3/5 3.3 7.3 47.5% 73.9% 51.1% 61.3% 39.9% 62.1% 34.0% 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8%
24 1997 2/2 8.0 8.5 54.8% 68.1% 38.6% 46.8% 28.6% 54.8% 33.6% 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9%
25 1998 17/17 6.9 6.1 51.7% 78.8% 49.4% 58.3% 39.8% 64.2% 33.9% 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4%
26 1999 32/35 6.6 4.3 54.6% 75.3% 50.7% 54.8% 37.8% 64.1% 33.4% 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0%
27 2000 20/29 9.6 5.6 49.3% 73.6% 46.7% 54.3% 35.2% 59.9% 31.9% 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3%
Career — 87/103 7.3 5.3 51.9% 75.1% 49.3% 57.2% 38.9% 62.7% 32.9% — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Tieleman David Wheaton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
20 1993 1539 101.3 +0.30 -0.77 1.004 48.9% — — +98 47.6% -0.52 1–1 1–1 — +0.78 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) 99.0 -1.35
21 1994 1533 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 2–0 — -0.18 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) 103.8 -1.34
22 1995 1526 97.9 -1.88 -3.07 0.656 44.0% — — +108 30.8% -1.69 1–0 1–0 — +0.41 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) 105.6 -4.05
23 1996 1484 97.3 -0.40 +0.45 0.896 48.4% — — +155 27.3% -0.91 0–1 0–2 — +0.53 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) 103.1 +0.32
24 1997 1459 103.0 -1.61 -3.02 0.744 44.8% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 — — +0.07 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) 101.7 -1.90
25 1998 1594 123.4 +1.29 -2.10 0.947 50.0% -107 — +163 53.7% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 107.0 +0.20 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) 104.5 -1.67
26 1999 1605 122.2 +1.18 -3.84 0.930 48.7% -38 — +94 45.3% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +1.02 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) 92.1 +0.22
27 2000 1548 109.7 -1.89 -4.30 0.796 46.5% +23 -109 +70 37.9% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 98.2 +1.41 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) 97.1 +0.53
28 2001 1533 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 +0.20
29 2002 1503 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 92.3 +0.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27
Career — 1653 115.4 +0.12 -3.11 0.882 48.1% -24 -109 +118 42.8% -0.61 12–17 (41%) 21–21 (50%) 102.1 +4.16 — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.