H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lawson Duncan vs Harold Solomon H2H: 1-0
Lawson Duncan holds a 1–0 lead over Harold Solomon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lawson Duncan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lawson Duncan won the 1985 Washington third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1985* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Lawson Duncan | 6-3 6-1 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawson Duncan | #1,094 | #47 | 317 | 1,761 | 105 | 110 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lawson Duncan | Harold Solomon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #165 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #59 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #174 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #93 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1989 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #91 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 |