H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Li Tu vs Pedro Sousa H2H: 0-1
Pedro Sousa holds a 1–0 lead over Li Tu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pedro Sousa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pedro Sousa won the 2021 Murray River Open second round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2021* | Murray River Open | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Pedro Sousa | 6-4 7-6(5) | Li Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li Tu | #464 | #160 | 350 | 1,661 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pedro Sousa | #1,188 | #99 | 726 | 1,567 | 9 | 27 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Li Tu | Pedro Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1479 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #521 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #105 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #173 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #497 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |