H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Liam Broady vs Federico Gaio

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Liam Broady vs Federico Gaio.

Great Britain Age 32 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
ITA Age 34 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liam Broady #158 7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 Federico Gaio #142 Match data Mar 25, 2021* Q2 Q Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liam Broady #197 #93 657 1,734 21 34 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federico Gaio #1,461 #124 548 1,568 3 15 16.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liam Broady Federico Gaio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2012 0–1 0.0% 1,468 0 0
21 2015 1–1 50.0% #301 1,480 0 0
22 2016 0–2 0.0% #302 1,484 0 0
23 2017 2–2 50.0% #170 1,584 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #245 1,505 0 0
24 2018 1–2 33.3% #273 1,545 0 0 2016 0–1 0.0% #175 1,471 0 0
25 2017 2–2 50.0% #254 1,478 0 0
26 2020 0–1 0.0% #188 1,552 0 0 2018 0–2 0.0% #210 1,549 0 0
27 2021 5–6 45.5% #128 1,616 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #152 1,487 0 0
28 2022 5–8 38.5% #163 1,725 0 0 2020 0–3 0.0% #137 1,428 0 0
29 2023 6–7 46.2% #108 1,684 0 0 2021 1–4 20.0% #153 1,515 0 0
30 2024 1–4 20.0% #546 1,586 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #425 1,478 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liam Broady Federico Gaio
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2012 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2016 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2017 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2022 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2023 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2024 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 11 13 24 45.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 18 27 33.3% 0 8 8 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 51/55 of Liam Broady's and 18/18 of Federico Gaio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Liam Broady Federico Gaio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2012 1/1 2.0 5.0 54.5% 58.3% 30.0% 20.0% 0.0% 45.5% 22.7% —/—
21 2015 2/2 8.5 5.5 56.2% 68.7% 44.6% 66.8% 43.4% 58.2% 33.0% —/—
22 2016 2/2 4.0 2.0 66.7% 63.4% 55.3% 63.9% 11.1% 60.8% 28.0% —/—
23 2017 4/4 3.8 1.3 66.3% 65.9% 60.5% 57.9% 45.5% 62.8% 41.4% 2015 1/1 2.0 4.0 64.0% 71.9% 38.9% 0.0% 33.3% 60.0% 25.5%
24 2018 3/3 3.0 3.0 59.6% 59.2% 39.5% 36.6% 53.3% 51.0% 33.0% 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 62.5% 60.0% 25.0% 58.3% 42.9% 46.9% 39.1%
25 —/— 2017 4/4 7.0 7.5 52.9% 75.3% 53.0% 73.1% 32.1% 64.8% 31.7%
26 2020 1/1 3.0 1.0 62.1% 67.1% 38.0% 60.0% 66.7% 56.1% 27.5% 2018 2/2 4.5 7.5 54.6% 67.8% 48.1% 71.7% 36.7% 58.9% 32.6%
27 2021 8/11 3.8 1.8 66.1% 65.0% 51.4% 58.3% 36.2% 60.4% 38.2% 2019 1/1 10.0 5.0 55.1% 69.4% 47.5% 44.4% 42.9% 59.6% 34.7%
28 2022 12/13 4.6 2.5 62.2% 67.1% 51.5% 55.0% 39.1% 61.1% 33.1% 2020 3/3 9.0 3.7 56.7% 73.1% 47.7% 40.0% 45.7% 62.1% 37.2%
29 2023 13/13 3.1 3.2 55.7% 69.1% 47.5% 50.7% 39.8% 59.2% 37.2% 2021 5/5 2.0 2.4 58.7% 64.4% 47.9% 31.5% 37.6% 57.6% 34.7%
30 2024 5/5 3.6 5.0 59.9% 63.8% 48.5% 69.9% 43.8% 57.9% 36.8% 2022 1/1 4.0 2.0 45.8% 78.8% 38.5% 70.0% 25.0% 56.9% 34.7%
Career 51/55 3.9 2.8 60.9% 66.1% 49.4% 55.3% 39.5% 59.2% 35.4% 18/18 5.0 4.6 56.2% 69.9% 46.7% 49.2% 37.3% 59.7% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liam Broady Federico Gaio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2009 1503 100.2
16 2010 1484 97.4
17 2011 1488 94.4
18 2012 1469 95.1 -6.56 +3.14 0.417 34.1% 0.0% -4.50 -0.11 2010 1495 102.2
19 2013 1473 99.4
20 2012 1482 99.7
21 2015 1481 103.6 -0.62 -3.21 0.789 47.0% 37.5% -0.63 1–0 0–1 +0.09
22 2016 1485 110.1 +2.59 +0.59 0.714 44.4% 16.7% -1.84 0–1 0–1 -0.13
23 2017 1584 120.3 +0.83 +0.38 1.113 52.3% +25 50.0% +0.80 1–1 -0.08 2015 1505 112.7 -0.95 +1.71 0.637 42.6% 0.0% -2.50 +0.01
24 2018 1545 109.1 -2.66 +1.05 0.674 42.6% 28.6% -2.28 1–0 -0.11 2016 1472 100.3 -0.98 -2.76 0.735 43.0% 0.0% -2.00 -0.04
25 2019 1560 103.7 2017 1478 103.6 -1.30 -0.39 0.899 48.1% +54 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.37
26 2020 1552 98.9 -0.97 +1.89 0.625 43.6% 25.0% -2.25 0.00 2018 1550 114.7 +0.83 -1.03 0.792 47.1% 0.0% -2.20 0–2 -0.01
27 2021 1617 117.6 -1.01 -0.05 0.964 49.6% -40 -52 48.3% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.05 2019 1488 103.6 -1.90 -4.23 0.859 46.7% 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.04
28 2022 1726 125.7 -0.85 -1.52 0.850 48.1% -10 -67 43.2% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 1–1 -0.28 2020 1429 102.4 +0.59 -1.53 0.979 49.5% 22.2% -1.00 0–1 0–2 +0.26
29 2023 1685 116.3 -2.36 0.00 0.912 48.7% +24 -14 47.1% -0.12 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.59 2021 1515 114.2 -0.31 -1.59 0.819 46.7% -47 20.0% -1.80 0–1 -0.31
30 2024 1586 108.2 -2.47 -1.66 0.873 48.8% +36 30.8% -1.00 0–1 0–1 -0.25 2022 1478 99.3 -0.15 -1.03 0.806 45.8% 0.0% -2.50 0–1 +0.03
31 2023 1475 94.9
32 2026 1528 94.1 2024 1466 97.6
Career 1734 117.6 -1.36 -0.44 0.868 48.0% +2 -39 41.3% -0.53 9–10 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 103.2 -0.43 1569 109.1 -0.41 -1.25 0.842 47.0% +4 20.9% -1.44 2–2 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.6 +1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.