H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 2-1
Libor Pimek holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1986 Stockholm second round 4-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1986* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tim Wilkison | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1985* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Libor Pimek | 6-4 6-7 6-1 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1985* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Libor Pimek | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |