H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lionel Roux vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 0-2
Daniel Vacek holds a 2–0 lead over Lionel Roux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1995 Toulouse third round 4-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1995* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Lionel Roux | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1995* | Marseille | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-1 7-5 | Lionel Roux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lionel Roux | #975 | #48 | 808 | 1,726 | 76 | 116 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lionel Roux | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #101 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #255 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #559 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |