H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lionel Roux vs Jens Knippschild H2H: 1-1
Lionel Roux and Jens Knippschild are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jens Knippschild leads 1–0 on clay, while Lionel Roux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lionel Roux won the 2000 Marseille third round 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2000* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lionel Roux | 3-0 (ret.) | Jens Knippschild | Match data |
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jens Knippschild | 6-4 6-3 6-0 | Lionel Roux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lionel Roux | #975 | #48 | 808 | 1,726 | 76 | 116 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jens Knippschild | #1,302 | #76 | 614 | 1,701 | 47 | 69 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lionel Roux | Jens Knippschild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #105 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #101 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #255 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #108 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #559 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |