H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 7-0

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 7–0 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2014 Cincinnati Masters second round 3-6 6-4 6-4.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2014* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #42 3-6 6-4 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #67 Match data
Aug 17, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #20 6-3 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #34 Match data
Mar 4, 2007* Las Vegas ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #20 6-4 7-6(10) Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data
Jan 13, 2006* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #4 6-1 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #53 Match data
Jun 23, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #10 6-2 6-4 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #42 Match data
May 28, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #12 6-4 6-4 4-6 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #51 Match data
May 16, 2004* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Lleyton Hewitt #17 6-4 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5