H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 0-1

Santiago Giraldo holds a 1–0 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Santiago Giraldo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Santiago Giraldo won the 2014 Madrid Open first round 7-5 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Santiago Giraldo
COL Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Santiago Giraldo #46 7-5 4-6 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #43 Match data May 6, 2014* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30
Santiago Giraldo #1,242 #28 1,230 1,929 142 186 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Santiago Giraldo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6 2007 0–4 0.0% #141 1,471 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2008 2–7 22.2% #163 1,602 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17 2009 0–3 0.0% #107 1,550 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2010 17–23 42.5% #64 1,715 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23 2011 29–26 52.7% #55 1,793 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24 2012 18–20 47.4% #57 1,792 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25 2013 14–24 36.8% #69 1,751 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26 2014 28–27 50.9% #32 1,787 0 0
27 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26 2015 21–26 44.7% #70 1,695 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27 2016 8–13 38.1% #91 1,694 0 0
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28 2017 3–10 23.1% #227 1,668 0 0
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28 2018 1–1 50.0% #253 1,645 0 0
31 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28 2019 1–2 33.3% #274 1,656 0 0
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Santiago Giraldo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
23 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2013 7 14 21 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 8 14 22 36.4% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 4 5 9 44.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — 56 92 148 37.8% 72 76 148 48.6% 14 17 31 45.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's and 324/328 of Santiago Giraldo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Santiago Giraldo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8% 2007 4/4 4.3 3.0 58.8% 65.7% 46.5% 63.4% 39.7% 57.7% 34.7%
20 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2% 2008 9/9 4.1 1.4 56.9% 63.1% 55.0% 49.7% 38.1% 59.6% 34.6%
21 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4% 2009 3/3 4.7 1.0 58.0% 62.9% 54.4% 70.5% 48.3% 59.2% 29.8%
22 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4% 2010 40/40 4.8 1.7 61.2% 69.7% 51.8% 57.9% 37.0% 62.7% 36.5%
23 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7% 2011 55/55 3.7 1.3 63.3% 68.3% 51.4% 58.6% 49.2% 61.9% 37.4%
24 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3% 2012 36/38 2.8 1.0 64.7% 67.1% 52.8% 64.1% 39.8% 62.3% 35.8%
25 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0% 2013 38/38 4.2 1.8 63.6% 69.1% 51.9% 54.0% 39.7% 62.8% 35.4%
26 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3% 2014 55/55 3.7 1.4 63.9% 70.2% 51.5% 60.7% 46.5% 63.1% 37.6%
27 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0% 2015 45/47 2.7 1.4 69.2% 66.5% 48.6% 57.5% 36.6% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5% 2016 21/21 4.9 1.9 56.6% 69.6% 49.9% 49.4% 43.3% 60.9% 36.8%
29 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0% 2017 13/13 4.3 2.9 61.1% 67.8% 40.8% 52.4% 38.3% 57.1% 33.1%
30 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3% 2018 2/2 2.5 0.0 64.4% 66.0% 51.4% 50.0% 20.0% 60.8% 33.6%
31 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7% 2019 3/3 2.3 1.3 71.2% 67.5% 54.6% 61.1% 37.0% 64.0% 36.3%
32 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Santiago Giraldo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 103.2 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) 104.4 -2.41 2006 1489 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) 102.4 -2.06 2007 1472 108.1 -1.44 -0.51 0.820 46.6% +35 — — 18.2% -1.18 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.20
20 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) 104.9 +1.18 2008 1602 121.8 -2.27 -0.88 0.857 47.1% +14 -45 — 28.6% -1.14 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.32
21 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) 108.8 -1.87 2009 1550 114.7 -2.83 -1.90 0.730 45.5% — — — 22.2% -1.78 0–1 1–1 — +0.26
22 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 92.8 +1.40 2010 1716 137.5 -0.76 +0.26 0.979 49.4% -38 -35 -156 43.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.7 +0.06
23 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 103.8 -2.32 2011 1794 154.0 -0.50 +0.21 0.983 50.0% -22 -10 -202 50.7% +0.04 11–11 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 98.6 -1.33
24 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) 107.6 -1.18 2012 1792 145.3 +0.06 +0.03 0.950 49.5% -18 +45 -225 50.0% +0.04 3–8 (27%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.75
25 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 +0.55 2013 1752 136.2 -1.11 -1.26 0.950 49.0% -13 -3 -180 38.9% -0.50 5–8 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 94.1 +1.40
26 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 94.4 +1.23 2014 1787 149.4 -0.14 +1.00 1.018 50.6% -95 +113 -154 50.0% +0.06 7–8 (47%) 12–9 (57%) 100.9 +0.16
27 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) 92.4 -1.01 2015 1695 140.7 -2.68 -0.26 0.922 48.7% -48 +140 -52 45.8% -0.20 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 98.6 +1.63
28 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 97.5 -1.75 2016 1694 132.8 -2.00 +0.54 0.940 48.9% -1 +40 — 42.6% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 6–3 (67%) 100.4 -0.14
29 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -0.34 2017 1668 117.0 -3.98 -2.23 0.771 45.3% -24 +59 — 30.3% -1.18 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 +0.11
30 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.11 2018 1646 110.0 +1.63 +0.23 0.858 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.15
31 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -0.31 2019 1656 107.0 -2.00 0.00 1.010 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.26
32 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 104.4 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.9 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 90.2 +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21 — 1929 142.1 -1.10 -0.04 0.951 49.2% -33 +56 -153 44.7% -0.25 41–59 (41%) 50–63 (44%) 91.8 +0.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.