H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Lloyd Bourne vs Rodney Harmon H2H: 0-1

Rodney Harmon holds a 1–0 lead over Lloyd Bourne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rodney Harmon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rodney Harmon won the 1985 Nancy round of 32 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lloyd Bourne
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Rodney Harmon
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rodney Harmon #108 6-0 6-2 Lloyd Bourne #105 Match data Mar 21, 1985* R32 Nancy ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lloyd Bourne #867 #71 0 1,742 68 91 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rodney Harmon #641 #56 0 1,750 34 42 44.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lloyd Bourne Rodney Harmon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1980 2–3 40.0% #344 1,515 0 0
19 1978 0–1 0.0% #555 1,491 0 0 1981 3–2 60.0% — 1,566 0 0
20 1979 1–3 25.0% #332 1,494 0 0 1982 9–5 64.3% #67 1,718 0 0
21 1980 1–2 33.3% #292 1,494 0 0 1983 9–10 47.4% #61 1,715 0 0
22 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,509 0 0 1984 8–15 34.8% #123 1,591 0 0
23 1982 22–18 55.0% #79 1,670 0 0 1985 3–7 30.0% #296 1,544 0 0
24 1983 11–17 39.3% #98 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1984 19–20 48.7% #99 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1985 6–13 31.6% #191 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1986 0–1 0.0% #544 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1987 2–3 40.0% #160 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lloyd Bourne Rodney Harmon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1982 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1981 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1982 11 9 20 55.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1983 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 4 8 12 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 39 63 38.1% 10 12 22 45.5% 26 25 51 51.0% 8 15 23 34.8% — 19 17 36 52.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lloyd Bourne Rodney Harmon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1516 113.2 — — — — — +33 — 33.3% -1.67 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
19 1978 1492 100.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.06 1981 1566 114.0 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% -0.17 2–0 — — +0.20
20 1979 1495 111.3 — — — — — +41 — 30.0% -1.90 1–1 1–1 — -0.26 1982 1719 134.4 — — — — +29 -130 — 57.1% +0.17 1–1 4–1 (80%) — +0.47
21 1980 1495 103.1 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 — +0.13 1983 1716 127.2 — — — — +36 — -130 45.8% -0.46 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) — -0.29
22 1981 1510 117.7 — — — — +5 -5 +73 34.7% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.00 1984 1591 125.0 — — — — +70 -31 +11 37.1% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.82
23 1982 1670 135.5 — — — — -31 -62 -53 50.5% -0.09 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.59 1985 1545 94.8 — — — — +91 -16 — 26.1% -2.13 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.59
24 1983 1644 129.3 — — — — -60 — +36 44.9% -0.63 5–9 (36%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 1639 123.6 — — — — -42 -44 +63 45.1% -0.37 4–4 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 1567 115.3 — — — — -6 — +66 39.6% -0.60 1–5 (17%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1554 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 1571 108.9 — — — — -26 — — 41.2% -0.59 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1742 129.8 — — — — -31 -32 +32 43.6% -0.52 27–30 (47%) 29–27 (52%) 102.8 +2.12 — 1750 128.5 — — — — +50 -39 -42 42.2% -0.70 14–6 (70%) 18–9 (67%) 113.5 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.