H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Lucas Pouille vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0

Lucas Pouille holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucas Pouille leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucas Pouille won the 2015 Moscow round of 16 6-1 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucas Pouille
France Age 32 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucas Pouille #70 6-1 7-6(5) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #95 Match data Oct 23, 2015* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucas Pouille #583 #10 2,746 2,034 137 131 51.1% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucas Pouille Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2013 1–4 20.0% #204 1,572 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2014 2–4 33.3% #133 1,653 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2015 12–14 46.2% #78 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2016 33–21 61.1% #15 2,015 0 1 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2017 34–20 63.0% #18 1,954 0 4 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2018 22–20 52.4% #32 1,805 0 5 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2019 21–21 50.0% #22 1,873 0 5 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2021 5–14 26.3% #155 1,670 0 5 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2022 3–6 33.3% #381 1,615 0 5 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2023 1–1 50.0% #330 1,670 0 5 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2024 3–4 42.9% #101 1,733 0 5 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2025 0–2 0.0% #554 1,703 0 5 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucas Pouille Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2015 7 9 16 43.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 18 13 31 58.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2018 16 12 28 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2024 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 81 77 158 51.3% 36 38 74 48.6% 20 16 36 55.6% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 266/268 of Lucas Pouille's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucas Pouille Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2013 5/5 5.8 3.6 53.8% 65.3% 52.7% 68.3% 29.7% 59.6% 29.8% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2014 6/6 4.8 3.2 59.2% 67.3% 44.2% 57.8% 54.2% 58.0% 38.3% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2015 26/26 4.9 3.3 55.0% 69.5% 51.0% 61.6% 37.6% 61.1% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 53/54 8.5 3.6 54.9% 73.9% 50.7% 59.6% 46.1% 63.5% 35.4% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2017 54/54 8.5 4.0 56.3% 75.5% 54.0% 65.0% 46.2% 66.1% 37.6% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2018 42/42 9.1 3.9 56.5% 75.1% 49.9% 66.5% 39.2% 64.0% 33.8% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2019 42/42 7.2 3.7 58.4% 72.0% 53.1% 64.5% 35.4% 64.3% 33.0% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2021 19/19 7.3 5.2 52.3% 70.7% 45.5% 60.3% 39.0% 58.5% 34.8% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2022 9/9 5.0 4.6 55.6% 71.3% 47.9% 61.2% 43.2% 60.5% 35.3% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2023 2/2 1.5 3.5 52.0% 66.3% 48.5% 70.8% 32.5% 57.9% 37.7% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2024 6/7 5.5 3.2 56.1% 71.6% 46.6% 44.6% 42.6% 60.6% 37.5% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2025 2/2 4.5 6.0 52.0% 82.0% 36.0% 80.5% 0.0% 59.5% 28.5% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 266/268 7.6 3.8 55.9% 73.0% 50.9% 62.9% 41.2% 63.2% 35.2% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucas Pouille Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2013 1573 111.9 -1.40 -1.83 0.738 45.9% — — — 25.0% -1.09 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.03 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2014 1654 131.1 -2.20 +2.30 0.912 48.7% -26 — — 37.5% -0.81 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.06 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2015 1701 133.8 -1.49 +0.18 0.911 48.9% -53 +45 — 46.8% -0.58 1–3 (25%) 9–2 (82%) 104.8 +0.15 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 2016 159.8 +0.67 +0.29 0.972 49.7% -66 -154 -294 53.4% +0.07 15–6 (71%) 18–9 (67%) 116.9 -0.57 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2017 1955 156.0 +1.95 +1.28 1.111 51.9% -27 -47 -170 59.0% +0.48 11–6 (65%) 15–16 (48%) 101.6 +3.76 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2018 1805 144.4 +0.50 -1.71 0.939 49.4% +52 +23 -12 48.6% -0.01 9–5 (64%) 11–14 (44%) 100.0 +2.47 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2019 1873 156.8 +0.45 -0.73 0.926 49.1% +19 -71 -2 50.9% +0.03 6–6 (50%) 14–13 (52%) 98.2 -0.44 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2021 1670 120.5 -2.72 -1.59 0.838 47.2% +121 +7 — 35.3% -1.06 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 92.9 -0.30 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2022 1615 126.8 -1.67 +0.07 0.893 48.2% +118 +29 — 38.5% -0.62 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.06 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2023 1671 112.4 -0.67 +0.06 0.894 48.1% — — — 50.0% -0.34 — — — +0.09 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2024 1733 119.4 -1.01 +0.25 0.951 49.5% +3 — +165 42.9% -0.07 1–1 1–1 — +0.18 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2025 1704 113.4 -0.01 +0.30 0.704 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.43 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2035 150.6 +0.18 -0.14 0.956 49.5% -2 -43 -94 49.4% -0.09 47–36 (57%) 75–62 (55%) 106.2 +1.88 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.