H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lucas Pouille vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Lucas Pouille holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucas Pouille leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucas Pouille won the 2015 Moscow fourth round 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Lucas Pouille | 6-1 7-6(5) | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas Pouille | #583 | #10 | 2,746 | 2,040 | 137 | 131 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucas Pouille | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #15 | 2,019 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,954 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #32 | 1,804 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #22 | 1,871 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #330 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,727 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,698 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |