H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lucas Pouille vs Marius Copil H2H: 2-1
Lucas Pouille holds a 2–1 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lucas Pouille leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2017 Metz fourth round 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017* | Metz | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marius Copil | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Lucas Pouille | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2017* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Lucas Pouille | 6-1 6-4 | Marius Copil | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lucas Pouille | 6-4 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Marius Copil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas Pouille | #583 | #10 | 2,746 | 2,040 | 137 | 131 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucas Pouille | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #15 | 2,019 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,954 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #32 | 1,804 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #22 | 1,871 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #330 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,727 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,698 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |