H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lucas Pouille vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 1-1
Lucas Pouille and Ruben Bemelmans are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2018 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-4 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(6) | Lucas Pouille | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lucas Pouille | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Ruben Bemelmans | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2016 | Dubai | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Lucas Pouille | 6-2 6-3 | Ruben Bemelmans | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-4 6-1 | Lucas Pouille | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas Pouille | #583 | #10 | 2,746 | 2,040 | 137 | 131 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucas Pouille | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #15 | 2,019 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,954 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #32 | 1,804 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #22 | 1,871 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #330 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,727 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,698 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |