H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Luiz Mattar vs Francisco Roig H2H: 1-1
Luiz Mattar and Francisco Roig are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on clay, while Francisco Roig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Roig won the 1991 Guaruja fourth round 6-2 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1991* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Francisco Roig | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1990* | Genova | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 6-3 6-3 | Francisco Roig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luiz Mattar | Francisco Roig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |