H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Lukas Lacko vs Abdullah Maqdes

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lukas Lacko vs Abdullah Maqdes.

SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
KUW Age 39 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #76 6-2 7-6(1) Abdullah Maqdes #881 Match data Feb 27, 2012 Q1 Q Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Abdullah Maqdes #1,655 #496 67 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Lacko Abdullah Maqdes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
33 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukas Lacko Abdullah Maqdes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1483 98.6
19 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% 16.7% -2.67 +0.02
20 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% 25.0% -2.00 1–1 +0.29
21 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) -0.10
22 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) -0.83 2009 1482 94.5
23 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) -0.54 2010 1461 97.5
24 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) -0.47
25 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) -0.64 2012 1433 100.7
26 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) -0.19 2013 1425 98.7
27 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) -0.16
28 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) +0.21
29 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) +0.17
30 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) +1.00
31 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 25.0% -1.63 +0.11
32 2020 1514 93.5
33 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 +0.09
34 2022 1445 93.3
Career 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48 1500 96.4

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.