H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lukas Lacko vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-1
Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2012 Basel third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2012* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 6-4 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukas Lacko | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |