H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Lukas Lacko vs Maximo Gonzalez H2H: 1-0

Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Maximo Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2015 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-2 7-5 6-7(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Maximo Gonzalez
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #121 4-6 6-2 6-2 Maximo Gonzalez #151 Match data Jan 17, 2017* Q2 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lukas Lacko #99 4-6 6-2 7-5 6-7(4) 6-1 Maximo Gonzalez #98 Match data Jan 21, 2015* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maximo Gonzalez #467 #58 992 1,703 28 59 32.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Lacko Maximo Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #121 1,511 0 0
24 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0 2008 4–5 44.4% #132 1,585 0 0
25 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0 2009 11–12 47.8% #66 1,671 0 0
26 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0 2010 3–9 25.0% #141 1,606 0 0
27 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0 2011 3–12 20.0% #121 1,561 0 0
28 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #347 1,498 0 0
29 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #157 1,565 0 0
30 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0 2014 3–4 42.9% #103 1,643 0 0
31 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0 2015 0–6 0.0% #147 1,579 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2016 2–5 28.6% #150 1,553 0 0
33 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0 2017 1–1 50.0% #392 1,546 0 0
41 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,525 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukas Lacko Maximo Gonzalez
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
25 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
33 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — 3 14 17 17.6% 25 41 66 37.9% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's and 86/86 of Maximo Gonzalez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukas Lacko Maximo Gonzalez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9% 2007 2/2 1.0 3.0 61.7% 66.9% 39.6% 31.4% 70.8% 56.1% 32.7%
24 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2% 2008 9/9 0.9 2.8 60.8% 63.2% 42.8% 62.2% 34.9% 55.4% 37.1%
25 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6% 2009 23/23 1.6 3.0 63.7% 64.9% 47.6% 54.8% 40.4% 58.3% 40.7%
26 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4% 2010 12/12 1.2 1.8 67.6% 62.4% 42.9% 56.4% 38.8% 56.3% 36.0%
27 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3% 2011 15/15 1.5 2.2 67.0% 59.7% 49.5% 54.9% 39.0% 56.3% 34.7%
28 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2% 2012 1/1 1.0 4.0 61.8% 61.8% 47.6% 75.0% 71.4% 56.4% 46.2%
29 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4% 2013 2/2 6.0 4.0 66.1% 73.4% 44.7% 65.0% 33.3% 63.6% 39.7%
30 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5% 2014 7/7 2.6 2.3 63.3% 65.2% 53.1% 59.5% 49.0% 60.7% 38.9%
31 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.2 61.4% 58.8% 45.0% 44.4% 45.0% 53.3% 33.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 7/7 3.6 3.9 61.6% 62.8% 50.8% 64.3% 26.0% 57.9% 38.3%
33 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3% 2017 2/2 0.5 3.5 66.6% 63.9% 42.7% 67.5% 63.3% 56.7% 41.0%
Career — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5% — 86/87 1.8 2.7 64.2% 63.1% 46.9% 56.5% 40.6% 57.2% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukas Lacko Maximo Gonzalez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83 2006 1498 100.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54 2007 1511 112.1 -2.12 -3.76 0.746 44.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.32
24 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47 2008 1586 114.6 -3.86 +1.74 0.831 46.8% — +29 — 36.0% -1.04 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.38
25 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64 2009 1672 131.3 -3.18 +1.75 0.974 49.4% -160 +81 — 50.0% -0.35 4–5 (44%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.03
26 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 2010 1606 114.0 -3.97 -1.44 0.823 45.9% -115 +94 — 29.0% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.31
27 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16 2011 1562 124.1 -3.49 -1.83 0.794 45.9% — +94 — 28.2% -1.31 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.07
28 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21 2012 1499 103.8 -2.10 +0.15 1.058 51.7% — — — 33.3% +0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
29 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17 2013 1565 111.8 -1.44 +2.24 1.091 51.0% — — — 57.1% +0.86 — 0–1 — +0.07
30 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00 2014 1643 125.4 -0.36 +0.55 0.991 49.9% — +105 — 45.0% -0.25 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.51
31 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11 2015 1580 112.3 -4.07 -2.34 0.719 43.7% — +102 — 22.2% -2.39 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.10
32 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1553 109.0 -2.84 -0.78 0.909 47.8% — +82 — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.58
33 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09 2017 1546 103.9 -0.73 -0.32 0.948 49.7% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 0–1 — -0.04
34 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1525 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.52
Career — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48 — 1704 123.3 -3.09 -0.09 0.879 47.5% -132 +82 — 37.9% -0.91 16–21 (43%) 10–15 (40%) 93.9 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.