H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lukas Lacko vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 1-0
Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Robby Ginepri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2010 Chennai fourth round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2010* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lukas Lacko | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |