H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Lukas Rosol vs Dudi Sela H2H: 0-2
Dudi Sela holds a 2–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dudi Sela leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dudi Sela won the 2015 Australian Open second round 7-6(2) 5-7 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Dudi Sela | 7-6(2) 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2014* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dudi Sela | 6-3 7-6(2) | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dudi Sela | #1,031 | #29 | 1,397 | 1,802 | 120 | 168 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lukas Rosol | Dudi Sela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #75 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #83 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #109 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #73 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #96 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #67 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #236 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |