H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Lukas Rosol vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 7-6(7) 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 7-6(7) 1-6 6-3 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukas Rosol | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |