H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Lukas Rosol vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-0
Lukas Rosol holds a 1–0 lead over Santiago Giraldo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2016 Chennai third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2016* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-3 6-4 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lukas Rosol | Santiago Giraldo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |