H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Lukas Rosol vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-0

Lukas Rosol holds a 1–0 lead over Santiago Giraldo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2016 Chennai round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Santiago Giraldo
COL Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Rosol #55 6-3 6-4 Santiago Giraldo #70 Match data Jan 7, 2016* R32 Chennai ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Santiago Giraldo #1,242 #28 1,230 1,929 142 186 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Rosol Santiago Giraldo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–4 0.0% #141 1,471 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 2–7 22.2% #163 1,602 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0 2009 0–3 0.0% #107 1,550 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #64 1,715 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0 2011 29–26 52.7% #55 1,793 0 0
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0 2012 18–20 47.4% #57 1,792 0 0
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0 2013 14–24 36.8% #69 1,751 0 0
26 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0 2014 28–27 50.9% #32 1,787 0 0
27 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1 2015 21–26 44.7% #70 1,695 0 0
28 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2 2016 8–13 38.1% #91 1,694 0 0
29 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2 2017 3–10 23.1% #227 1,668 0 0
30 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2 2018 1–1 50.0% #253 1,645 0 0
31 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2 2019 1–2 33.3% #274 1,656 0 0
32 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukas Rosol Santiago Giraldo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 7 14 21 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 8 14 22 36.4% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 4 5 9 44.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — — 56 92 148 37.8% 72 76 148 48.6% 14 17 31 45.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's and 324/328 of Santiago Giraldo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukas Rosol Santiago Giraldo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 4.3 3.0 58.8% 65.7% 46.5% 63.4% 39.7% 57.7% 34.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 9/9 4.1 1.4 56.9% 63.1% 55.0% 49.7% 38.1% 59.6% 34.6%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2% 2009 3/3 4.7 1.0 58.0% 62.9% 54.4% 70.5% 48.3% 59.2% 29.8%
22 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6% 2010 40/40 4.8 1.7 61.2% 69.7% 51.8% 57.9% 37.0% 62.7% 36.5%
23 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0% 2011 55/55 3.7 1.3 63.3% 68.3% 51.4% 58.6% 49.2% 61.9% 37.4%
24 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8% 2012 36/38 2.8 1.0 64.7% 67.1% 52.8% 64.1% 39.8% 62.3% 35.8%
25 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2% 2013 38/38 4.2 1.8 63.6% 69.1% 51.9% 54.0% 39.7% 62.8% 35.4%
26 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6% 2014 55/55 3.7 1.4 63.9% 70.2% 51.5% 60.7% 46.5% 63.1% 37.6%
27 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2% 2015 45/47 2.7 1.4 69.2% 66.5% 48.6% 57.5% 36.6% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8% 2016 21/21 4.9 1.9 56.6% 69.6% 49.9% 49.4% 43.3% 60.9% 36.8%
29 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1% 2017 13/13 4.3 2.9 61.1% 67.8% 40.8% 52.4% 38.3% 57.1% 33.1%
30 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8% 2018 2/2 2.5 0.0 64.4% 66.0% 51.4% 50.0% 20.0% 60.8% 33.6%
31 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4% 2019 3/3 2.3 1.3 71.2% 67.5% 54.6% 61.1% 37.0% 64.0% 36.3%
32 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4% — 324/328 3.7 1.5 63.4% 68.3% 50.9% 57.8% 41.8% 61.8% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukas Rosol Santiago Giraldo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1489 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1472 108.1 -1.44 -0.51 0.820 46.6% +35 — — 18.2% -1.18 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.20
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1602 121.8 -2.27 -0.88 0.857 47.1% +14 -45 — 28.6% -1.14 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.32
21 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23 2009 1550 114.7 -2.83 -1.90 0.730 45.5% — — — 22.2% -1.78 0–1 1–1 — +0.26
22 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 2010 1716 137.5 -0.76 +0.26 0.979 49.4% -38 -35 -156 43.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.7 +0.06
23 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 2011 1794 154.0 -0.50 +0.21 0.983 50.0% -22 -10 -203 50.7% +0.04 11–11 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 98.6 -1.33
24 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05 2012 1792 145.3 +0.06 +0.03 0.950 49.5% -18 +45 -225 50.0% +0.04 3–8 (27%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.75
25 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 97.7 +0.09 2013 1752 136.2 -1.11 -1.26 0.950 49.0% -13 -3 -180 38.9% -0.50 5–8 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 94.1 +1.40
26 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) 102.8 -1.04 2014 1787 149.4 -0.14 +1.00 1.018 50.6% -95 +113 -154 50.0% +0.06 7–8 (47%) 12–9 (57%) 100.9 +0.16
27 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 97.4 +1.39 2015 1695 140.7 -2.68 -0.26 0.922 48.7% -48 +140 -52 45.8% -0.20 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 98.6 +1.63
28 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) 107.1 -1.09 2016 1694 132.8 -2.00 +0.54 0.940 48.9% -1 +40 — 42.6% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 6–3 (67%) 100.4 -0.14
29 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) 102.7 -1.23 2017 1668 117.0 -3.98 -2.23 0.771 45.3% -24 +59 — 30.3% -1.18 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 +0.11
30 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) 101.9 -1.96 2018 1646 110.0 +1.63 +0.23 0.858 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.15
31 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08 2019 1656 107.0 -2.00 0.00 1.010 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.26
32 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41 — 1929 142.1 -1.10 -0.04 0.951 49.2% -33 +56 -154 44.7% -0.25 41–59 (41%) 50–63 (44%) 91.8 +0.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.