H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lukasz Kubot vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-2
Daniel Brands holds a 2–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Brands leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2013 Basel fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013* | Basel | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 6-2 6-4 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2011* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-2 6-2 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukasz Kubot | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |