H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Lukasz Kubot vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 1-0
Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2011 Acapulco third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2011* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 7-5 6-0 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2009* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | Q3 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukasz Kubot | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |