H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
M. Woodforde vs B. Scanlon H2H: 2-1
M. Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over B. Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, M. Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts, while B. Scanlon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, M. Woodforde won the 1987 US Open first round 6-2 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | M. Woodforde | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | B. Scanlon | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1986* | Auckland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | M. Woodforde | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | B. Scanlon | Match data |
| Dec 27, 1985* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | B. Scanlon | 6-3 7-5 | M. Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| B. Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | M. Woodforde | B. Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |