H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mackenzie McDonald vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 1-2
Diego Schwartzman holds a 2–1 lead over Mackenzie McDonald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mackenzie McDonald won the 2023 Washington second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2023* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Mackenzie McDonald | 6-3 6-3 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2023* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Diego Schwartzman | 6-2 6-4 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2022* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Diego Schwartzman | 6-2 6-2 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackenzie McDonald | #140 | #37 | 1,146 | 1,868 | 113 | 146 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mackenzie McDonald | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #673 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #129 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #41 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #131 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |