H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Magnus Gustafsson vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 1-1
Magnus Gustafsson and Emilio Sanchez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on carpet, while Emilio Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1990 Stuttgart Indoor fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1990* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Magnus Gustafsson | 6-3 6-0 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1987* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 6-2 7-5 | Magnus Gustafsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Gustafsson | #681 | #10 | 2,141 | 2,012 | 394 | 252 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Gustafsson | Emilio Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #53 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #51 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #31 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1991 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #47 | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1993 | 50–29 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1994 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #33 | 1,857 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,732 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1996 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 1997 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #37 | 1,830 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 1999 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,802 | 0 | 13 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2000 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #82 | 1,718 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2001 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #82 | 1,695 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |