H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 2-0
Magnus Norman holds a 2–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Norman leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2003 Casablanca third round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2000* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-2 6-2 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |