H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 1-2
Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–1 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2003 San Jose third round 7-5 3-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-5 3-6 7-6(3) | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2002* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1996* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 6-3 6-2 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Kenneth Carlsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 |