Magnus Norman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | 3 | 7 | 10 | Sep 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Jonas Bjorkman | 6 | 1 | 7 | Jul 11, 2002 | H2H |
| Hicham Arazi | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 10, 2003 | H2H |
| Mariano Zabaleta | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 16, 2002 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 6 | 0 | 6 | Jul 18, 2002 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–1 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Italian Open round of 64 2-6 1-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | 2-6 1-2 (ret.) | Magnus Norman | Match data | May 8, 2002* | R64 | Italian Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Magnus Norman | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data | Aug 27, 2000* | F | Long Island | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Thomas Enqvist | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Magnus Norman | Match data | Jan 8, 2000* | SF | Adelaide International | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 6-4 | Magnus Norman | Match data | Nov 13, 1999* | SF | Stockholm Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Thomas Enqvist | 7-5 6-3 | Magnus Norman | Match data | Apr 30, 1998* | R32 | Munich Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Thomas Enqvist | 7-5 6-3 | Magnus Norman | Match data | Nov 6, 1997* | R32 | Stockholm Open | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 236 | 164 | 59.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 424 | 283 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 19 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2000 | 66–24 | 73.3% | #4 | 1,862 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,870 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,746 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,672 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,594 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,712 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #72 | 1,623 | 0 | 19 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,588 | 0 | 19 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 19 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 20 | 1996 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 1997 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1995 | 44 | 13 | 57 | 77.2% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% |
| 22 | 1998 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1996 | 36 | 15 | 51 | 70.6% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% |
| 23 | 1999 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% |
| 24 | 2000 | 39 | 16 | 55 | 70.9% | 26 | 6 | 32 | 81.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 25 | 2001 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 34 | 14 | 48 | 70.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2002 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 32 | 14 | 46 | 69.6% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% |
| 27 | 2003 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Career | — | 112 | 82 | 194 | 57.7% | 103 | 61 | 164 | 62.8% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | — | 286 | 161 | 447 | 64.0% | 49 | 53 | 102 | 48.0% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 70 | 48 | 118 | 59.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 345/400 of Magnus Norman's and 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 1992 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 46.5% | 50.0% | 43.5% | 50.0% | — | 46.5% | 27.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5/6 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 45.5% | 72.9% | 56.0% | 57.6% | 42.2% | 63.8% | 40.8% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 24/25 | 6.2 | 5.3 | 54.7% | 72.3% | 48.2% | 51.1% | 44.8% | 61.5% | 40.4% |
| 19 | 1995 | 5/5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 58.3% | 66.1% | 42.1% | 45.9% | 61.6% | 56.6% | 44.5% | 1993 | 35/41 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 54.1% | 72.8% | 42.5% | 53.3% | 40.6% | 58.9% | 39.5% |
| 20 | 1996 | 21/23 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 60.3% | 72.6% | 52.3% | 59.5% | 51.1% | 64.1% | 38.6% | 1994 | 37/42 | 7.2 | 5.1 | 54.5% | 74.3% | 45.8% | 52.9% | 43.7% | 61.3% | 39.1% |
| 21 | 1997 | 62/68 | 8.9 | 3.2 | 52.5% | 73.7% | 50.1% | 66.5% | 40.4% | 62.3% | 37.7% | 1995 | 75/85 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 55.6% | 76.9% | 50.5% | 57.6% | 47.7% | 65.5% | 42.5% |
| 22 | 1998 | 44/52 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 50.7% | 70.4% | 47.7% | 60.2% | 37.2% | 59.0% | 36.6% | 1996 | 62/77 | 7.1 | 4.2 | 56.6% | 76.5% | 48.7% | 53.3% | 46.6% | 64.8% | 41.3% |
| 23 | 1999 | 58/64 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 56.9% | 74.3% | 53.1% | 64.1% | 44.8% | 65.3% | 42.0% | 1997 | 48/56 | 8.1 | 3.2 | 56.0% | 78.5% | 55.2% | 57.5% | 44.3% | 68.0% | 39.5% |
| 24 | 2000 | 72/90 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 62.8% | 74.1% | 53.1% | 60.4% | 45.8% | 66.2% | 42.0% | 1998 | 42/50 | 10.4 | 3.6 | 56.0% | 78.5% | 53.9% | 60.9% | 47.0% | 67.6% | 39.0% |
| 25 | 2001 | 36/40 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 69.7% | 50.6% | 58.4% | 49.5% | 61.9% | 40.1% | 1999 | 56/70 | 8.4 | 4.1 | 56.7% | 77.3% | 52.5% | 56.4% | 45.6% | 66.5% | 39.4% |
| 26 | 2002 | 20/31 | 5.4 | 1.9 | 60.0% | 66.6% | 53.4% | 55.4% | 46.7% | 61.7% | 37.4% | 2000 | 63/74 | 8.3 | 4.7 | 55.3% | 77.4% | 53.6% | 61.7% | 39.5% | 66.5% | 40.1% |
| 27 | 2003 | 26/26 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 54.7% | 72.4% | 48.4% | 51.6% | 42.4% | 61.0% | 34.8% | 2001 | 40/52 | 7.6 | 5.1 | 54.0% | 74.5% | 50.5% | 65.8% | 38.9% | 63.4% | 39.7% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 34/40 | 7.6 | 5.5 | 50.4% | 76.6% | 50.2% | 54.1% | 49.2% | 63.5% | 39.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 34/36 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 54.8% | 75.5% | 48.8% | 53.9% | 45.5% | 63.5% | 34.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 31/32 | 7.9 | 5.5 | 54.9% | 74.1% | 47.0% | 55.4% | 42.0% | 61.8% | 34.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19/19 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 51.9% | 73.7% | 49.2% | 65.5% | 42.6% | 61.8% | 37.8% |
| Career | — | 345/400 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 57.0% | 72.3% | 51.0% | 60.6% | 44.2% | 63.0% | 39.3% | — | 605/707 | 7.7 | 4.6 | 55.0% | 76.1% | 50.3% | 57.2% | 44.3% | 64.5% | 39.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1484 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 16 | 1992 | 1489 | 97.1 | -2.65 | -0.49 | 0.510 | 36.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.12 | 1990 | 1480 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.17 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1467 | 113.2 | +0.83 | +1.32 | 1.128 | 51.8% | +54 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.11 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1736 | 143.0 | +1.05 | +1.79 | 1.050 | 51.1% | +5 | -200 | — | 56.7% | +0.40 | 7–2 (78%) | 6–7 (46%) | 106.2 | -0.26 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1543 | 116.2 | -0.81 | +1.84 | 1.024 | 50.4% | — | +44 | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | — | — | — | -0.23 | 1993 | 1714 | 135.6 | -1.12 | +1.54 | 0.961 | 49.3% | +26 | -227 | — | 45.7% | -0.17 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–9 (31%) | 96.7 | -0.87 |
| 20 | 1996 | 1673 | 132.2 | +1.15 | +0.51 | 1.073 | 51.5% | -81 | -5 | — | 54.2% | +0.17 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–5 (55%) | 106.7 | +0.42 | 1994 | 1763 | 142.0 | +0.37 | +0.31 | 1.012 | 50.3% | +20 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.03 | 10–4 (71%) | 9–11 (45%) | 105.3 | +0.15 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1826 | 144.4 | +0.12 | +0.66 | 1.000 | 50.4% | -71 | +28 | -150 | 57.8% | +0.31 | 13–9 (59%) | 15–11 (58%) | 110.1 | -2.25 | 1995 | 1986 | 163.3 | +3.55 | +4.87 | 1.232 | 53.7% | +20 | -396 | -453 | 68.5% | +1.29 | 19–6 (76%) | 14–11 (56%) | 111.4 | -0.31 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1720 | 134.9 | -2.02 | -0.53 | 0.893 | 48.2% | -36 | +101 | -63 | 43.7% | -0.53 | 10–6 (63%) | 13–11 (54%) | 103.8 | -1.55 | 1996 | 1980 | 153.5 | +2.88 | +3.65 | 1.173 | 53.1% | +30 | -418 | -435 | 64.7% | +0.99 | 10–9 (53%) | 18–12 (60%) | 98.5 | +2.31 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1890 | 143.4 | +3.19 | +3.30 | 1.209 | 53.2% | -71 | +6 | -255 | 63.9% | +1.14 | 9–8 (53%) | 9–11 (45%) | 98.8 | +0.39 | 1997 | 1880 | 152.3 | +4.95 | +2.12 | 1.234 | 53.5% | +25 | -302 | — | 62.7% | +0.98 | 8–9 (47%) | 7–8 (47%) | 93.3 | +0.31 |
| 24 | 2000 | 1863 | 155.8 | +4.09 | +4.23 | 1.245 | 53.7% | -12 | +197 | — | 68.3% | +1.04 | 15–11 (58%) | 19–14 (58%) | 98.2 | +0.50 | 1998 | 1870 | 154.5 | +4.80 | +2.35 | 1.203 | 53.2% | +16 | -139 | -212 | 63.6% | +1.12 | 15–6 (71%) | 8–14 (36%) | 103.2 | -1.78 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1747 | 136.1 | -0.01 | +1.60 | 1.054 | 51.1% | +59 | +154 | — | 57.1% | +0.21 | 6–5 (55%) | 10–8 (56%) | 97.1 | +1.62 | 1999 | 1914 | 157.9 | +4.04 | +2.58 | 1.178 | 52.9% | +37 | -203 | -259 | 62.2% | +0.83 | 11–9 (55%) | 15–12 (56%) | 98.0 | -1.56 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1672 | 129.6 | -0.57 | -0.27 | 0.977 | 49.8% | +62 | +78 | — | 40.6% | -0.62 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | 94.2 | -0.34 | 2000 | 1907 | 156.1 | +4.14 | +2.79 | 1.197 | 53.2% | +29 | -125 | -211 | 65.3% | +1.07 | 18–10 (64%) | 18–15 (55%) | 101.6 | -0.24 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1595 | 121.7 | -0.64 | -1.88 | 0.892 | 48.0% | +92 | +37 | — | 40.7% | -0.59 | 3–5 (38%) | 7–3 (70%) | 102.0 | +0.28 | 2001 | 1848 | 146.2 | +1.04 | +1.56 | 1.084 | 51.4% | +10 | -28 | -76 | 56.6% | +0.52 | 11–7 (61%) | 10–13 (43%) | 98.6 | +0.65 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1804 | 148.3 | +1.76 | +2.14 | 1.089 | 51.9% | +110 | -50 | -67 | 56.0% | +0.54 | 8–4 (67%) | 10–7 (59%) | 103.1 | +0.01 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1712 | 135.7 | +0.99 | -1.33 | 0.944 | 48.9% | +66 | -44 | — | 37.2% | -0.56 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–13 (32%) | 91.2 | -2.28 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1623 | 132.3 | -0.69 | -1.15 | 0.905 | 48.6% | +21 | +44 | +89 | 45.8% | -0.26 | 2–10 (17%) | 10–11 (48%) | 90.3 | -0.37 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1589 | 135.5 | -1.21 | +0.62 | 0.989 | 50.1% | +67 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.23 | 0–5 (0%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.8 | -0.73 |
| Career | — | 2041 | 146.5 | +1.12 | +1.55 | 1.063 | 51.2% | -17 | +80 | -164 | 56.7% | +0.36 | 65–54 (55%) | 83–69 (55%) | 103.9 | -0.26 | — | 2013 | 156.4 | +2.42 | +2.14 | 1.113 | 52.0% | +32 | -167 | -178 | 58.0% | +0.62 | 130–96 (58%) | 139–150 (48%) | 98.2 | -0.73 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | 3 | 7 | 10 | Sep 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Jonas Bjorkman | 6 | 1 | 7 | Jul 11, 2002 | H2H |
| Hicham Arazi | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 10, 2003 | H2H |
| Mariano Zabaleta | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 16, 2002 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 6 | 0 | 6 | Jul 18, 2002 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6 | 7 | 13 | Oct 15, 2003 | H2H |
| Richey Reneberg | 10 | 1 | 11 | Mar 11, 1998 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 3 | 7 | 10 | Feb 21, 2004 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 5 | 5 | 10 | Jan 25, 2004 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 7 | 3 | 10 | Jan 3, 2002 | H2H |