H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 1-5

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–1 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Rome Masters second round 2-6 1-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Enqvist #24 2-6 1-2 (ret.) Magnus Norman #148 Match data
Aug 27, 2000* Long Island ATP 250 F Hard Magnus Norman #3 6-3 5-7 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data
Jan 8, 2000* Adelaide ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #4 3-6 6-2 6-2 Magnus Norman #15 Match data
Nov 13, 1999* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 6-3 6-4 Magnus Norman #19 Match data
Apr 30, 1998* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Enqvist #21 7-5 6-3 Magnus Norman #22 Match data
Nov 6, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #20 7-5 6-3 Magnus Norman #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 — — — — — — — 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 — — — — — — — 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 — — — — — — — 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 — — — — — — — 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19