H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Marat Safin vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 2-1
Marat Safin holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2004 US Open first round 7-6(5) 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 7-6(5) 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Marat Safin | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2001 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marat Safin | 7-5 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1999* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marat Safin | 6-4 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 |