H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Marc Gicquel vs Daniel Brands

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marc Gicquel vs Daniel Brands.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marc Gicquel #117 7-6(3) 6-3 Daniel Brands #68 Match data Mar 21, 2013* Q2 Q Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Gicquel Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Gicquel Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Gicquel Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Gicquel Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.08 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.22 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.69 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.