H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 1-0
Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2008 Casablanca third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2008* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marc Gicquel | 6-3 6-0 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2007 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 6-2 6-3 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| May 23, 2005 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Marc Gicquel | 7-5 6-0 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |