Marc Gicquel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 23, 2010 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 7, 2014 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC
Marc Gicquel holds a 2–1 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marc Gicquel leads 2–0 on clay, while Thiemo de Bakker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2010 US Open first round 6-4 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiemo de Bakker | 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Marc Gicquel | Match data | Sep 1, 2010* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Marc Gicquel | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data | Jul 18, 2008* | R16 | Dutch Open | International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Marc Gicquel | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data | Jul 21, 2006* | R16 | Dutch Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,787 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 43 | 59 | 102 | 42.2% | 26 | 33 | 59 | 44.1% | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | — | 27 | 45 | 72 | 37.5% | 20 | 24 | 44 | 45.5% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 205/205 of Marc Gicquel's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 54.6% | 74.1% | 49.1% | 72.9% | 41.7% | 62.8% | 39.2% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5/5 | 8.2 | 1.2 | 65.7% | 71.8% | 58.9% | 57.1% | 49.6% | 67.3% | 25.6% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2/2 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 55.0% | 73.1% | 56.3% | 68.6% | 31.3% | 66.0% | 34.0% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 1.4 | 62.2% | 70.1% | 51.0% | 61.2% | 36.1% | 62.1% | 36.0% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 49/49 | 9.8 | 1.6 | 61.0% | 73.7% | 53.5% | 60.8% | 41.7% | 65.8% | 35.9% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 13/13 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 54.5% | 68.0% | 48.7% | 53.9% | 21.4% | 59.2% | 28.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 55.3% | 60.2% | 42.0% | 48.5% | 100.0% | 52.1% | 28.9% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17/17 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 60.6% | 69.6% | 45.6% | 62.0% | 41.5% | 60.2% | 34.7% |
| 25 | 2002 | 2/2 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 52.9% | 72.9% | 53.5% | 87.5% | 50.0% | 63.1% | 24.8% | 2014 | 12/13 | 8.7 | 2.2 | 57.1% | 77.0% | 47.1% | 64.2% | 26.3% | 64.1% | 33.6% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7/7 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 54.3% | 74.6% | 49.2% | 59.1% | 37.8% | 63.0% | 34.9% |
| 27 | 2004 | 3/3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 60.1% | 62.3% | 54.0% | 15.7% | 35.2% | 59.0% | 36.3% | 2016 | 17/17 | 7.2 | 1.5 | 60.3% | 70.5% | 47.1% | 49.0% | 36.1% | 61.3% | 33.8% |
| 28 | 2005 | 5/5 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 63.1% | 72.8% | 48.4% | 52.4% | 44.6% | 64.0% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 29/29 | 6.8 | 1.6 | 54.9% | 75.8% | 50.6% | 66.8% | 37.8% | 64.1% | 36.7% | 2018 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 71.7% | 60.6% | 15.4% | 33.3% | — | 47.8% | 15.8% |
| 30 | 2007 | 46/46 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 57.9% | 74.2% | 50.2% | 59.6% | 38.2% | 63.8% | 34.8% | 2019 | 1/1 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 58.2% | 68.8% | 17.4% | 69.2% | — | 47.3% | 21.4% |
| 31 | 2008 | 45/45 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 58.5% | 73.2% | 49.1% | 62.8% | 43.5% | 63.2% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 46/46 | 5.8 | 2.8 | 55.7% | 73.1% | 51.9% | 65.3% | 39.3% | 63.8% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 17/17 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 69.5% | 48.9% | 50.4% | 46.6% | 59.4% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 53.8% | 71.8% | 52.6% | 40.3% | 27.8% | 62.6% | 28.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 61.4% | 72.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 40.0% | 63.9% | 42.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 5/5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 53.0% | 61.9% | 43.9% | 58.1% | 39.2% | 52.9% | 27.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 3/3 | 7.7 | 1.0 | 64.8% | 77.5% | 53.7% | 53.6% | 41.9% | 69.0% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 205/205 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 56.8% | 73.0% | 50.3% | 60.8% | 40.4% | 63.1% | 35.8% | — | 133/134 | 8.1 | 1.8 | 59.5% | 72.0% | 49.7% | 58.8% | 37.6% | 63.0% | 33.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1513 | 104.7 | -0.21 | +0.15 | 1.055 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.08 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1502 | 115.2 | -0.81 | -3.06 | 0.782 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 35.7% | -0.79 | 0–2 | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.08 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1532 | 107.0 | -0.17 | -0.92 | 1.000 | 50.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1612 | 119.7 | +1.05 | -2.08 | 0.949 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 41.7% | -0.58 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | 0.00 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1764 | 149.9 | +1.79 | +0.33 | 1.050 | 50.7% | -70 | +14 | -122 | 50.8% | +0.25 | 7–5 (58%) | 11–16 (41%) | 101.3 | +0.27 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1665 | 125.5 | -1.60 | -4.74 | 0.686 | 44.4% | -43 | +82 | — | 27.0% | -1.97 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.3 | -0.54 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1642 | 103.3 | -3.01 | -3.23 | 0.604 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.03 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1684 | 129.6 | -1.39 | -1.41 | 0.871 | 47.6% | -45 | +78 | -77 | 37.8% | -0.81 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.5 | -0.74 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1501 | 101.9 | +0.60 | -0.57 | 0.672 | 47.2% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | 2014 | 1665 | 127.0 | +0.17 | -1.17 | 0.935 | 48.9% | +12 | — | — | 48.1% | -0.19 | 2–1 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.8 | +0.61 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1471 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1618 | 116.8 | +1.14 | -1.79 | 0.944 | 49.0% | — | +111 | — | 41.2% | -0.17 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | +0.19 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1520 | 105.8 | -1.54 | -0.60 | 0.885 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.55 | 2016 | 1583 | 124.7 | -1.66 | -1.23 | 0.874 | 47.5% | +82 | +70 | — | 34.9% | -1.05 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.4 | -0.71 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1544 | 107.2 | +1.50 | +0.12 | 1.141 | 52.0% | +14 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.27 | 1–0 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1750 | 135.4 | +1.93 | -0.94 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -8 | -166 | — | 58.9% | +0.30 | 5–4 (56%) | 8–7 (53%) | 102.6 | +0.08 | 2018 | 1558 | 101.5 | -1.76 | -3.04 | 0.303 | 33.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1711 | 135.5 | +0.72 | -1.60 | 0.962 | 49.2% | +21 | -89 | -185 | 45.9% | -0.15 | 7–6 (54%) | 9–6 (60%) | 104.0 | -0.22 | 2019 | 1536 | 99.8 | +0.16 | -1.51 | 0.406 | 36.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 31 | 2008 | 1697 | 134.8 | +0.16 | -0.18 | 0.988 | 49.9% | -51 | -11 | +5 | 45.9% | -0.16 | 4–8 (33%) | 10–9 (53%) | 96.8 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 1718 | 138.5 | +0.34 | +0.15 | 1.022 | 50.3% | -16 | -6 | -26 | 49.1% | -0.07 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.3 | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1643 | 123.6 | -2.04 | -2.07 | 0.852 | 47.8% | +67 | -11 | -42 | 35.0% | -0.90 | 0–2 | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 1576 | 104.0 | -0.75 | -0.94 | 0.755 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 10.0% | -1.70 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 1592 | 108.8 | +2.93 | -4.09 | 1.168 | 52.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 1621 | 111.9 | -3.55 | -2.25 | 0.591 | 41.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.08 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 1640 | 117.0 | +2.04 | +0.21 | 1.292 | 53.2% | +39 | — | — | 71.4% | +0.86 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1787 | 131.8 | +0.34 | -0.77 | 0.970 | 49.5% | -4 | -57 | -51 | 46.1% | -0.22 | 22–30 (42%) | 40–38 (51%) | 99.1 | +0.38 | — | 1854 | 134.5 | +0.13 | -1.17 | 0.910 | 48.5% | -29 | +62 | -104 | 41.6% | -0.54 | 18–21 (46%) | 33–36 (48%) | 101.5 | -0.74 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 23, 2010 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 7, 2014 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 15, 2018 | H2H |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 24, 2016 | H2H |
| Juan Monaco | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 12, 2015 | H2H |
| Igor Sijsling | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 18, 2014 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 13, 2013 | H2H |