H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 2-1
Marc Gicquel holds a 2–1 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marc Gicquel leads 2–0 on clay, while Thiemo de Bakker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2010 US Open first round 6-4 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Thiemo de Bakker | 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2008* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marc Gicquel | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2006* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marc Gicquel | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |