H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Marc Rosset vs Tomas Behrend H2H: 0-2

Tomas Behrend holds a 2–0 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Behrend leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Behrend won the 2001 Munich Open round of 32 7-6(7) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Behrend
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Behrend #160 7-6(7) 6-2 Marc Rosset #64 Match data May 3, 2001* R32 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Behrend #106 0-6 6-1 7-6(4) Marc Rosset #45 Match data Mar 2, 2000* R32 Copenhagen ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,956 406 335 54.8% 0 1 0 0 2 12 15
Tomas Behrend #1,008 #74 515 1,676 41 72 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Rosset Tomas Behrend
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,812 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,649 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1992 37–22 62.7% #35 1,879 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,942 0 7 1997 1–1 50.0% #281 1,513 0 0
23 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,931 0 9 — — — — — — —
24 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 11 1999 1–1 50.0% #119 1,522 0 0
25 1996 33–28 54.1% #22 1,784 0 11 2000 7–11 38.9% #142 1,524 0 0
26 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 12 2001 5–8 38.5% #129 1,610 0 0
27 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,745 0 12 2002 0–2 0.0% #155 1,636 0 0
28 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 13 2003 11–13 45.8% #87 1,606 0 0
29 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,733 0 15 2004 5–10 33.3% #139 1,532 0 0
30 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,603 0 15 2005 7–14 33.3% #89 1,574 0 0
31 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,598 0 15 2006 4–12 25.0% #204 1,456 0 0
32 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,587 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,547 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Rosset Tomas Behrend
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1 6 7 14.3% 22 11 33 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 1997 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 21 14 35 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 11 9 20 55.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1999 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1998 13 13 26 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2000 16 12 28 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
30 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2005 0 4 4 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154 134 288 53.5% 112 102 214 52.3% 26 31 57 45.6% 114 68 182 62.6% — 11 24 35 31.4% 27 42 69 39.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 592/673 of Marc Rosset's and 109/113 of Tomas Behrend's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Rosset Tomas Behrend
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 45/46 7.8 3.6 54.9% 77.0% 46.8% 53.3% 32.5% 63.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 48/59 8.9 3.8 57.4% 77.3% 50.4% 57.4% 42.5% 66.0% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 62/67 9.9 3.6 58.7% 79.4% 50.7% 65.4% 39.9% 67.5% 38.7% 1997 2/2 3.5 2.0 54.4% 75.8% 51.8% 28.6% 75.0% 64.7% 43.6%
23 1994 66/73 10.0 5.1 57.1% 79.2% 48.8% 64.6% 40.2% 66.3% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 50/59 9.3 4.8 55.3% 79.3% 50.6% 63.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.1% 1999 2/2 5.0 3.0 58.3% 73.0% 60.3% 66.7% 75.0% 67.1% 46.9%
25 1996 48/61 10.9 4.6 58.8% 80.6% 48.5% 63.0% 45.0% 67.5% 35.7% 2000 17/18 3.1 4.1 59.9% 66.8% 47.4% 55.1% 40.4% 58.9% 40.0%
26 1997 54/63 7.7 5.8 55.4% 76.0% 45.8% 57.7% 38.9% 62.7% 37.2% 2001 10/13 2.4 4.9 59.0% 66.2% 49.9% 64.6% 41.0% 59.4% 43.9%
27 1998 48/54 9.6 6.4 54.6% 79.0% 46.3% 50.1% 31.9% 64.3% 35.9% 2002 2/2 4.5 10.0 48.9% 65.3% 41.2% 41.7% 39.7% 53.1% 40.5%
28 1999 47/53 9.9 6.9 53.7% 79.4% 46.8% 63.0% 41.5% 64.5% 36.4% 2003 24/24 5.2 3.4 63.5% 69.3% 49.3% 58.4% 33.8% 61.8% 33.1%
29 2000 49/56 10.0 6.2 57.6% 77.0% 47.8% 55.6% 39.3% 64.3% 36.5% 2004 15/15 3.4 2.7 63.9% 68.5% 45.3% 60.4% 46.5% 60.0% 36.0%
30 2001 30/35 9.4 7.5 56.2% 74.8% 42.5% 60.1% 40.5% 60.7% 32.0% 2005 21/21 4.2 3.3 60.7% 66.4% 44.8% 56.0% 35.9% 57.8% 33.3%
31 2002 18/20 13.6 7.3 57.8% 78.0% 49.5% 63.8% 40.4% 66.0% 32.4% 2006 16/16 3.6 4.1 57.2% 66.1% 38.4% 45.6% 41.5% 54.6% 35.4%
32 2003 15/15 10.3 7.7 56.3% 76.6% 46.2% 64.8% 45.0% 63.4% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 12/12 9.2 4.6 58.6% 76.7% 45.3% 51.6% 37.4% 64.2% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Rosset Tomas Behrend
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1614 132.6 — — — — — +46 — 73.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1812 141.5 — — — — -150 -4 -202 54.4% +0.13 18–6 (75%) 17–7 (71%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1649 138.9 +2.30 -1.77 0.989 49.4% +23 +47 — 45.5% -0.40 3–12 (20%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1880 156.4 +3.97 -0.48 1.074 51.0% -52 -9 -248 59.7% +0.63 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1942 153.8 +5.65 +0.59 1.191 52.8% +30 -111 — 65.8% +0.89 13–7 (65%) 16–12 (57%) — -0.51 1997 1514 111.0 +1.61 -1.15 1.237 54.3% — — — 50.0% +1.25 — 0–1 — -0.06
23 1994 1931 148.4 +4.31 +0.54 1.138 51.9% +40 -202 -306 59.7% +0.31 13–10 (57%) 26–12 (68%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 1815 145.3 +3.76 -0.37 1.111 51.7% +19 +11 -111 60.8% +0.67 10–7 (59%) 18–15 (55%) — +1.03 1999 1523 112.3 +1.90 +0.07 1.426 57.4% — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.03
25 1996 1784 147.2 +4.82 -1.13 1.097 51.5% +4 +62 -40 55.5% +0.36 12–13 (48%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.64 2000 1525 113.6 -2.41 +0.56 0.973 49.4% +13 +21 — 40.4% -0.45 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.17
26 1997 1631 133.6 +1.06 -0.88 0.997 49.8% +7 +208 +88 51.3% +0.01 12–8 (60%) 14–15 (48%) — +1.44 2001 1611 124.0 -1.00 +2.40 1.082 51.4% -37 +15 — 40.6% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.43
27 1998 1745 145.3 +1.96 -0.58 1.005 49.5% +36 -39 -45 50.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.59 2002 1636 112.6 -0.96 +1.05 0.863 46.6% — — — 25.0% -1.75 0–1 1–0 — -0.36
28 1999 1658 138.7 +2.15 -0.73 1.026 50.4% +83 -45 -24 49.6% +0.20 8–8 (50%) 8–15 (35%) — +1.75 2003 1607 117.9 -0.87 -3.14 0.867 47.7% -15 +27 — 42.4% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.34
29 2000 1733 140.8 +2.25 -0.56 1.023 50.0% +41 -77 -59 57.2% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.28 2004 1533 112.2 -1.44 -1.11 0.900 48.4% — +39 — 35.3% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.65
30 2001 1604 126.4 -1.32 -4.04 0.816 46.8% +95 -7 -35 33.7% -0.93 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.48 2005 1574 122.5 -3.27 -2.47 0.791 45.9% -48 +94 — 32.1% -1.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.90
31 2002 1599 127.6 +2.47 -3.30 0.951 49.2% +56 +4 -18 46.9% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.72 2006 1456 100.7 -5.32 -3.59 0.781 45.4% +26 +106 — 30.6% -1.36 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.40
32 2003 1587 123.1 +1.30 -1.92 0.911 48.7% +50 — -17 40.0% -0.77 0–1 7–3 (70%) — -0.48 2007 1459 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1548 116.7 +0.60 -3.15 0.886 47.7% +75 +9 — 40.7% -0.67 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 148.8 +2.94 -0.82 1.042 50.5% +22 +2 -83 54.3% +0.21 129–108 (54%) 183–150 (55%) 105.7 -0.42 — 1676 120.6 -2.22 -1.54 0.892 48.0% -11 +52 — 37.4% -0.77 16–17 (48%) 16–18 (47%) 102.9 +1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.