H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marcel Granollers vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Marcel Granollers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 Tokyo third round 1-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2013* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marcel Granollers | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |