H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marcelo Filippini vs David Rikl H2H: 0-1
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1992 Prague fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1992* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Rikl | 6-4 6-4 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Filippini | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |