H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Alberto Martin H2H: 2-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 Australian Open third round 6-4 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 6-3 7-6(3) | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2000* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(7) 7-6(3) | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |