H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 1-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 1–0 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1994 Gstaad third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1994* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 6-4 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |