H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 4-3

Marcelo Rios holds a 4–3 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 2001 St. Poelten third round 5-7 6-1 6-4.

CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
ITA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2001* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #120 5-7 6-1 6-4 Marcelo Rios #40 Match data
May 23, 1998* St. Poelten ATP 250 SF Clay Marcelo Rios #3 6-4 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #35 Match data
May 22, 1997* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Marcelo Rios #7 6-4 4-6 6-4 Andrea Gaudenzi #125 Match data
Apr 24, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marcelo Rios #10 6-2 6-2 Andrea Gaudenzi #112 Match data
Mar 9, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marcelo Rios #100 6-3 6-0 Andrea Gaudenzi #19 Match data
Jul 9, 1994* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #31 6-4 3-6 6-3 Marcelo Rios #238 Match data
Apr 8, 1994* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #60 6-1 6-1 Marcelo Rios #559 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,865 204 220 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,773 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,680 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1996 24–26 48.0% #55 1,654 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,640 0 0
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,677 0 1
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,645 0 1
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,592 0 1
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,693 0 3
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3