H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 1-0

Marcelo Rios holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1996 Scottsdale round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcelo Rios #20 6-1 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #85 Match data Mar 7, 1996* R32 Scottsdale World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,129 366 180 67.0% 0 5 1 2 10 18
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Andrei Chesnokov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,770 0 3 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,837 0 4 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,869 0 5 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,963 0 12 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,918 0 15 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4
24 2000 28–20 58.3% #37 1,796 0 16 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,839 0 18 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,822 0 18 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcelo Rios Andrei Chesnokov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 24 9 33 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1996 18 10 28 64.3% 28 10 38 73.7% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1997 23 11 34 67.6% 23 9 32 71.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1998 33 9 42 78.6% 23 5 28 82.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
23 1999 20 8 28 71.4% 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2001 23 11 34 67.6% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
26 2002 25 11 36 69.4% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2003 6 3 9 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 172 84 256 67.2% 164 74 238 68.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 26 16 42 61.9% — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/546 of Marcelo Rios's and 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcelo Rios Andrei Chesnokov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1994 20/23 3.7 2.1 60.5% 65.5% 52.6% 49.4% 48.5% 60.1% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 55/58 3.1 2.0 62.5% 69.4% 55.4% 59.3% 44.6% 64.1% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 69/77 4.3 2.7 52.3% 73.2% 53.0% 54.8% 48.7% 63.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 62/80 5.2 3.1 54.3% 71.9% 53.9% 58.8% 43.0% 63.7% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 69/84 4.8 2.1 59.2% 76.8% 57.1% 63.8% 47.6% 68.7% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 51/61 3.8 3.6 55.5% 70.9% 53.9% 56.5% 43.7% 63.2% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 43/48 6.1 3.8 55.1% 72.7% 53.6% 62.1% 42.8% 64.1% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 39/47 5.2 3.2 58.4% 72.0% 51.3% 60.6% 48.9% 63.3% 40.2% 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2%
26 2002 41/50 5.9 2.9 60.8% 70.2% 51.2% 59.0% 50.6% 62.7% 38.1% 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2%
27 2003 17/18 3.5 2.1 65.0% 73.6% 52.4% 56.3% 39.8% 66.5% 44.1% 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1%
Career — 466/546 4.6 2.8 57.5% 72.1% 53.8% 58.7% 46.1% 64.3% 41.0% — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcelo Rios Andrei Chesnokov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1994 1616 137.6 +0.45 +1.49 1.032 50.6% -52 +21 — 55.0% +0.22 3–7 (30%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1771 143.6 +2.61 +2.16 1.134 52.1% -64 +64 -204 62.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 15–7 (68%) — +0.33 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
20 1996 1838 152.6 +2.05 +2.33 1.101 51.6% -34 +60 — 61.9% +0.60 14–6 (70%) 18–8 (69%) — +2.50 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26
21 1997 1870 152.1 +2.50 +1.54 1.103 51.7% +18 +34 -203 62.1% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 16–20 (44%) — +2.15 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88
22 1998 1963 161.2 +5.86 +6.49 1.429 55.9% +47 +47 — 74.9% +1.61 6–7 (46%) 13–6 (68%) — +0.31 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32
23 1999 1918 149.7 +1.16 +3.33 1.141 52.4% +10 +119 — 68.0% +0.95 13–3 (81%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.91 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29
24 2000 1797 147.3 +2.03 +1.16 1.090 51.4% +20 +166 — 61.5% +0.77 7–9 (44%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.74 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31
25 2001 1839 143.7 +1.20 +2.08 1.095 51.6% +26 -19 — 57.9% +0.52 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.04 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62
26 2002 1820 149.1 +0.99 +1.31 1.023 50.6% +48 -37 — 63.5% +0.74 7–5 (58%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.28 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43
27 2003 1823 138.3 +2.95 +4.36 1.313 55.0% +78 -41 — 69.7% +1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.79 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
Career — 2130 155.6 +2.44 +2.75 1.148 52.4% +15 +57 -203 64.3% +0.85 88–58 (60%) 121–76 (61%) 107.0 +1.12 — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.