H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 2-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–1 lead over Arnaud Boetsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on clay, while Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1999 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-2 6-3 7-5 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(6) 6-3 6-4 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1996* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-2 6-4 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |