H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Brett Steven H2H: 1-2
Brett Steven holds a 2–1 lead over Marcelo Rios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Brett Steven leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1998 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 7-5 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Brett Steven | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1998* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Brett Steven | 6-3 6-3 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1995* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Brett Steven | 6-3 6-3 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Brett Steven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |