H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Daniel Nestor H2H: 3-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 3–0 lead over Daniel Nestor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1999 Singapore fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1999* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 6-1 | Daniel Nestor | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1999* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 | Daniel Nestor | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1996* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(7) | Daniel Nestor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Daniel Nestor | #1,106 | #58 | 752 | 1,737 | 69 | 101 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Daniel Nestor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #823 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #177 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #112 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #107 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #219 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #500 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1062 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |