H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-1
Marcelo Rios and David Prinosil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on clay, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2000 Hong Kong third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2000* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-1 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| May 12, 1999* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | David Prinosil | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |