H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Dennis van Scheppingen H2H: 1-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 1–0 lead over Dennis van Scheppingen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1997 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Marcelo Rios | 6-2 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(7) | Dennis van Scheppingen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Dennis van Scheppingen | #1,545 | #72 | 552 | 1,666 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Dennis van Scheppingen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #439 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2003 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #358 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |